Female Sexual Predators: The Veiled Epidemic
by
Gordon E. Finley, Ph.D.
From the increasing frequency with which
reports of female teachers having sex with their pupils are appearing in
the print and electronic media to Lauren Book’s article “My Nanny
Molested Me” in the February issue of Seventeen magazine, concerned
citizens have every right to be asking themselves: “What is going on
here?” And, perhaps most critically: “Is this the tip of the iceberg?”
Basically, the answer is “yes, it is the tip of the iceberg.” It also is
fair to ask: “How do we know?” It is difficult to know with precision
because female sexual predators have been a politically incorrect topic
and thus hidden from public view. However, we do know that the few
professionals who have worked in the area universally acknowledge
massive underreporting by the boy and girl victims of female sexual
predators and, even when reports of female sexual molestation emerge,
they are met with disbelief by parents and police.
Critically, we now have sufficient preliminary research evidence and
well documented case reports to know that we do have a serious social
problem which requires immediate public, Congressional, and Judicial
attention. Consider first the research.
A 2004 U. S. Department of Education report titled “Educator Sexual
Misconduct: A Synthesis of Existing Literature” cites two large sample
surveys in which students report that 43% of their molesters were female
sexual predators while smaller studies reported lower rates. A second
summary of studies and media reports can be found on the web site of The
Canadian Children’s Rights Council (http://www.canadiancrc.com/...).
This second group estimates that 25% of
sexual predators are female but also cite studies where the female
predator rates range from 1% to 82% with six studies reporting female
predator rates over 50%.
Taken together, these research studies substantiate the reality that we
currently are experiencing an epidemic of female sexual predators. These
reported rates are high by any standard and require immediate attention
and corrective action.
The most emotionally traumatic and moving evidence, however, comes not
from statistical studies but from heart rending individual case reports.
The best of this evidence can be found in a groundbreaking documentary
aired by the British Broadcasting Corporation on October 6, 1997, titled
“The Ultimate Taboo: Child Sexual abuse by women.” The transcript of
this documentary is available on the web site of The Canadian Children’s
Rights Council which notes: “This was a vivid and horrific programme in
which the victims of sexual abuse by women told disturbing stories of
emotional and physical damage.” (http://www.canadiancrc.com/...).
As the evidence continues to mount -- the daily media reports, the BBC
documentary, the empirical research studies -- it becomes increasingly
clear that the veiled epidemic of female sexual predators no longer can
be hidden and must be brought to full public light and serve as a call
for social change. As a society we require a massive change in our
social attitudes to begin to address the fact that the people to whom we
have most entrusted our children for centuries -- mothers, babysitters,
nuns, nannies, child care workers, and teachers – include female sexual
predators.
In my view, Child Abuse Prevention Month -- April 2006 -- provides a
unique opportunity to face squarely the politically incorrect reality
that female sexual predators do exist, do prey, and do so in substantial
numbers. It also provides an opportunity to create a paradigm shift
wherein we reframe the sexual abuse debate and acknowledge the existence
of both male and female sexual predators.
Continuing to deny that female sexual predators exist, prey, and do so
in substantial numbers not only continues to endanger our children but
also damages them -- physically, emotionally, and in their subsequent
relationships with others.
Denial serves only the best interests of practicing female sexual
predators.
Discuss This Article
Gordon E. Finley is
Professor of Psychology at Florida International University in Miami.
The opinions expressed in
this column represent those of the author and do not necessarily reflect
the opinions, views, or philosophy of TheRealityCheck.org
|