|
Prove to Us That You’re Still
On Our Side
by
Frank Salvato
There is
little doubt that a heated debate is taking place over the issue of
immigration reform. The alarming aspect of this debate is less the where,
when and why it is taking place and more about who the debate is between.
With
an overwhelming majority of Americans
from every political party in opposition to the current proposal being
floated by select senators and the White House, it appears – incredibly –
that the debate is actually between the people and our government.
Our nation is a Democratic Republic, a
Representative Democracy. The electorate casts ballots to elect
individuals to represent them in Washington DC. In turn, these elected
officials are bestowed the authority to place votes representative of
their constituents. In theory, these elected officials are charged with
learning about and debating the issues so that the concerns of their
constituents can be heard and the best interests of their constituents
safeguarded. In the end, they cast their votes on pieces of legislation as
representatives of their constituencies.
This is how it is supposed to work.
Most everyone has heard the expression, “inside
the beltway mentality.” It alludes to the attitude many elected officials
develop once they are elected and acclimated to office. It is a kind way
of saying that the pure motives they once had for wanting to serve their
constituency have faded, replaced by the seduction of power. It is a
gentle way of saying that they have forgotten from whence they came and
for whom they work and are now drunken with a greed for political capital,
addicted to the political game like crack-whores to the debilitating white
rock which they crave.
“...power tends to corrupt, and absolute power
corrupts absolutely.” – Lord Acton
The fact that a select group of senators hunkered
down with members of the Bush Administration in secret to hammer
out the provisions of anything should make every one of us suspect
of their intentions and their motives. With the exception of intelligence
gathering and select law enforcement operations, and war strategy and
planning, our government should be as transparent as Paris Hilton’s
religious epiphany.
There are two things that can be stated today
that few will argue with: 1) If someone is toting an AK-47 and is wearing
a black mask adorned with Arabic he is usually a terrorist, and 2) If
anyone in American government is contemplating legislation clandestinely
they more often than not don’t have their constituency’s best interest in
mind.
The piece of legislation currently being foisted
upon the American people by Harry Reid, Lindsay Graham, John McCain, John
Kyl, Ted Kennedy and President Bush does not best serve the interests of
our citizenry or the well-being of our nation. It is a political tool
crafted by those who place politics before good government and politicians
worried more about their political longevity than honestly serving their
constituents.
On the one side of the aisle we have Ted Kennedy
and Harry Reid literally drooling over the prospect of legalizing a voting
block they have had to pretend wasn’t voting in national elections, a
voting block courted by their party to do so regardless of its illegality.
Arguments that lend to validating this notion come in the form of
identifying the laughable motor-voter registration requirements and the
bleating protests over legislation requiring a photo ID to access a
ballot. Democrats see a new “underclass” they can legislate into existence
just in time to save their sorry behinds in light of the exodus of
American Blacks from the ranks of their party.
On the other side of the aisle we have the
spineless who routinely find themselves dancing on the end of special
interest puppet strings. They believe that legislating a new working-class
into existence will ingratiate “big business” into filling their campaign
coffers allowing them to once again outspend their political rivals in
their march toward re-election.
The losers in this pathetically transparent game
of political opportunism are not only the American people, but those
composing the ranks of this proposed new working-class/voting block.
I have stated in the past that I am all for
meaningful immigration reform. Our country is still reeling from the last
attempt at immigration reform – a complete amnesty and failure in border
enforcement, ironically crafted, yet again, by Teddy “Hey! There’s
saltwater in my scotch” Kennedy. It is well past time that this subject be
given honest consideration by those interested in preserving our American
heritage. This requires a measured and thoughtful contemplation of the
issue in a 21st Century context so that the best interests of the American
people – not those banging at the door to get in – are held in the highest
regard and so that our country isn’t sold to the highest bidder.
We, the American people, also need to demand that
the issues of border security and immigration reform be separated and
addressed as stand-alone issues. In a post-9/11 world – and as ABC News is
reporting that al Qaeda and the Taliban have dispatched legions of newly
trained suicide bombers to the US, Britain, Canada and Germany – we can
ill afford to wait for inside the beltway elitists to dislodge their
craniums from their sphincters so that they can see the seriousness of the
matter.
Those elected to office need to prove to the
American people that they are at least “on our side.” A good way to do
that is to immediately and successfully secure the borders. Then, and only
then, will we be inclined to believe that proposals for immigration reform
are genuine and not politically self-serving.
This issue exposes one more thing that is worth
mentioning here.
Many among us say that our system of government
is broken, citing partisan obstructionism, corruption and pandering to
special interests as proof of this assertion. The truth be told, our
system of government isn’t even close to being the problem. The problem is
an under-informed, unengaged, apathetic populace that keeps sending
charlatans to Washington DC because they are too pre-occupied with their
own lives to give a damn about our country!
If you want change, stop electing people who make
promises they never keep. If you want change, change the only person you
have control over; yourself. Read-up – honestly – on the issues, engage
your government and hold your elected officials accountable for their
words and actions. Until that change takes place the status quo will
remain, our country an over-populated and Balkanized place for your
apathy.
I’m sure Teddy, Harry, Lindsay the Johns and
George – and all the rest of the political creatures who apathy feeds –
will appreciate you for it.
Related Reading:
Poll: Voters Want Smaller Steps to Immigration Reform With
Focus on Enforcement
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/
poll_voters_want_smaller_steps_to_immigration_reform_with
_focus_on_enforcement
Frank Salvato is the managing editor for
The New Media Journal. He serves at the Executive
Director of the
Basics Project, a non-profit, non-partisan, 501(C)(3)
research and education initiative. His organization, Basics Project, is
partnered in producing the first-ever national symposium series on the
threat of radical Islamist terrorism. His pieces have been recognized by
the House International Relations Committee and the Japan Center for
Conflict. His pieces are regularly featured in over 100 publications both
nationally and internationally. He has appeared on The O’Reilly Factor. He
hosts NMJ Radio airing on BlogTalkRadio and heard around the world on
NetTalkWorld global talk radio. He is a regular guest on The Right Balance
with Greg Allen on the Accent Radio Network and The Captain’s America on
the World Internet Radio Network, heard in Camp Victory, Iraq, as well as
numerous radio shows coast to coast. Mr. Salvato is available for public
speaking engagements. He can be contacted at
newmediajournal@comcast.net.
New Media Alliance
Television
The opinions expressed in
this column represent those of the author and do not necessarily reflect
the opinions, views, or philosophy of TheRealityCheck.org
|