by
David R. Usher
Parents
might think twice about sending their children to
Rutgers
University. It may well be the most
anti-family college in America; a training camp for global feminist
terrorism.
Rutgers
is home base for the
Center for Women’s Global
Leadership (CWGL). The CWGL is a
major launch-point for global radical feminist initiatives primarily
attacking well-off developing countries while virtually ignoring areas
where women are truly in dire straits – such as Darfur.
The CWGL
just completed the “16
days of activism against gender violence”
campaign -- one of several extended feminist holidays worshipping
government and U.N. programs that entitle women to steal families, assets,
and businesses simply by hollering “abuse”. But the theme does not end
there: everything else found in the “V-dictionary”,
such as abortion, welfare entitlements, HIV/AIDS, GLBT agenda, poverty,
human rights congeal into one inseparable cause celebre driven by the
“abuse” word.
Rutgers
is an integral part of the
U.N. Feminist Rumor Mill. Virtually
all statistics and conclusions feminists make have been scientifically
proven to be
fantastical.
In fact,
the body of assertions made in the
U.N. Secretary Generals
Report on Violence Against Women were
so outrageous that the U.N. Third Committee voted unanimously to
only
“note” the report, rather than accept
it. In parliamentary language, this is a full rejection -- a rare event at
the United Nations.
For
example, radical activists claimed that “70 percent of married women
in India were victims of beatings or rape”. After much research,
Respecting Accuracy
in Domestic Abuse Reporting (RADAR)
found this was based on a graphic in a UNPF report that was obviously
mislabeled and meaningless. Yet, this
claim is the lead item on virtually every feminist website around the
world.
In fact,
there are so few truly scientific claims made in any of the U.N. or CWGL
documents, we can say the expenditure of federal and international monies
has been spent, in majority, on social terrorism of foreign countries.
I realize
this is a breathtaking statement to make. As always, I back my statements
up thoroughly. Now, we will examine recent events in India, which was
recently conquered by the feminist insurgency, and is just starting to
realize what happened.
Destruction of Marriage in India
In India,
the words “dowry death” or “bride burning” conjure up horrible images that
can be misused to fool legislators into passing anything. That is
precisely what happened.
India’s
new IPC 498a law permits any woman to claim dowry abuse – causing
government to swing into action as if Bin Laden just waltzed into the
White House. On mere allegation alone, her husband and members of his will
be incarcerated. Bail can be optionally granted only by a judge.
Incarceration prior to the initial bail hearing is often several months,
depending on how much the woman’s family greases the palms of police or
magistrate. Trials take between three and six years to be heard,
during which the individuals arrested are subject to constant harassment
and blackmail.
India did
not stop there.
Feminists harassed legislators into
passing the
most outrageous domestic violence law
anywhere in the world.
The new
Indian domestic violence law goes far beyond anything in Western law.
“Not providing money for maintaining you or your children” and “not paying
rent” are now crimes in India. This
criminalization of poverty insanely thrusts poor families into more
desperate straits than before: two households must be sustained on the
same income. Literally any domestic disagreement, no matter how minor, now
invokes destruction of the family in India.
The
excesses of these new laws are apparent and intuitively predictable. You
do not have to take my word for it.
Ex-wives are blaming the domestic violence law for making their lives
worse.
Police say that about 80% of dowry allegations are false.
Ajaib Singh, head of the Women and Child Support Unit in Chandigarh,
reports that only 20% of dowry claims are genuine.
Shantosh Singh, chairperson of Women
Welfare Counselling Cell at Sector 17, reveals the truth: ‘‘People
generally make use this law to facilitate a divorce. And often, it’s the
lawyers who advise the women to implicate their in-laws under the
provisions of this Act,’’
Indian
lawyers admit the truth, too.
‘There are only 10 per cent cases based on truth, and people usually come
to us and ask specifically to mention the element of dowry in their
divorce petitions,’’
The Times
of India was inundated with letters to the editor about horrendous legal
abuses – classified by the newspaper as “A
legal tool to earn quick money”.
498a.org
has quite a
collection of
articles documenting many instances
of intentional organized human rights abuses.
India’s
Supreme Court quickly recognized the problem. It described the new Dowry
law as “legal
terrorism”, but surprisingly lacked
the mettle to rule the law unconstitutional. As in America, what lines the
pockets of lawyers is unlikely to be stopped by courts.
Why is
“legal terrorism” endemic in India? It is all about money. The laws
entitle a woman to make a false allegation to lock up her spouse and
members of his family, and terrorize them for years, so his family has to
pay her a very large “reverse dowry” to drop the charges. Once the charges
are dropped, she is in full control of the family. He is summarily ejected
from society in divorce court, his career possibly ruined. Also, he is
used as another number to beef up crime statistics.
Here a
the sickening results of the feminist invasion of India. Of 58319 dowry
cases in
2004, 134,757 individuals were
incarcerated. Of these, 24,127 have been acquitted, and only 5,739
convicted. The rest are still “in limbo” living under the ragged sword of
feminism. This suggests that up to 95.8% of dowry cases in India are, in
fact, cases of terrorist blackmail.
Even
companies are vulnerable. Recently, a wife accused a husband of domestic
violence, and
filed suit against his employer, WiPro,
for “ruining her marriage” due to a “dating allowance” they were allegedly
giving her husband. Since the company does not provide “dating
allowances”,
she dropped the charge, but continues
to sue the company for ruining her marriage anyway.
Like Al
Qaeda, feminist terrorists will go to any length to seize control of
entire countries. An article published on November 30th by
CommonDreams.org, as part of Rutgers
activism campaign, still pretends that women will experience abuse rates
of up to 70% (despite
retraction by the Washington Times on November 28th, and full
rejection by the U.N. Third Committee on November 22nd).
From a
high-level perspective, we see that the purpose of these “laws” is to
seize money and establish imperial matriarchy in up-and-coming
export-positive developing countries. This is why we do not see feminists
marching on Darfur, where there is no money to be taken.
Studying
the feminist invasion of India is instructive. It is easier to recognize
that the “domestic violence” cabal is, in fact, a terrorist network when
we view the treachery inflicted on other countries.
America
is a primary source of this form of terrorism. People I met personally in
countries such as China, Japan, Singapore, Korea, and India are all too
aware of it. America is funding this invasion via federal entitlements,
and is substantially responsible for it. We must stop exporting legal
terrorism to developing countries in the name of “democracy”. We are
losing friends around the world, some of whom will predictably become
enemies with bombs on their backs.
History
suggests that radical destruction of marriage and family is far more
endemic and destructive than any of the human rights issues feminists
complain about in their diatribes.
America
must stop funding all radical organizations and programs destroying
families globally. American domestic violence laws, such as the Violence
Against Women Act (VAWA), and Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) must be fully
rewritten to be gender-neutral, require that agencies unequivocally
provide full assistance to anyone who requests it, and require solid
evidentiary proof before legal artillery is fired.
Mark
Twain once said “A lie can travel half-way around the world while the
truth is putting on its shoes”. After a decade of Violence Against Women
Act
abuses,
the truth now wears Army boots. The lie stops right here, and so does the
buck.
David R.
Usher is Senior Policy Analyst for the True Equality
Network and President of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children,
Missouri Coalition
The opinions expressed in
this column represent those of the author and do not necessarily reflect
the opinions, views, or philosophy of TheRealityCheck.org
