|
Weird
Politics of Science
by
Brad Snyder
The statement that it
doesn't matter what you believe, as long as you believe it enough, is
the tenet for many in the "Master of the Universe" deliberation. Did
something happen from nothing? Did an all powerful, all knowing, all
encompassing God create the heavens and the Earth with a purposeful
design? Or, Was Al Gore the originator of the cosmos? These are the
ostensibly unanswerable questions that seem to have our conductors of
scholarship so bewildered and perplexed.
The "something from
nothing" crowd currently has the upper hand in our classrooms. Their
claim that Science has proven that a big bang occurred, and by chance
the Earth found it's way for life to happen from a one celled paramecium
to a tadpole; then some sort of frog to a monkey; and a monkey to
mankind. Yeah, sure...that's what we should believe and teach our
kids. Actually, the Al Gore theory is looking more and more promising.
Or better yet, I recall being taught that we were all delivered by that
Vlasic Pickle stork, or something like that. It all seems so hazy now.
Fearful people cling to
the hope that all of life's mysteries can be unlocked to human
understanding. This is the reason science in the West has become the
humanist god. There's a misconception about what science is, and if we
don't find the answers we seek, we can make it because nobody else will
know the difference. What needs to be universally understood is that
science can never prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that our theories
are right. It can show us that an explanation is wrong or incomplete.
Thomas Edison is not just responsible for showing us how to make a light
bulb, but also thousands of ways not to. We should be ever mindful that
any theory, no matter how convincing, may one day be proven wrong.
The problem is,
Evolutionists pass their notions as proven scientific fact.
Harvard's professor of geology states "evolution is
as well documented as any phenomenon in science."
Yeah, and only in his dreams. The only thing that has been established
is that they can't be trusted. Much of what they claim as fact has
already been verified a hoax such as their darling "missing link, the
Paleontological ape man; a.k.a. the man who never existed.
Let's toss a few more
of their Scientific logs of marvel into the fire of fiction and fraud:
1. Albert Einstein's
theory of relativism: E = mc2. This is one of the most
basic rules of physics, that the speed of light, "C" is constant, and
doesn't change. This "fact" is now under attack, and there are
scientists in Australia who now believe that the speed of light is
slowing down. The implications, if proven false, will throw a
gargantuan monkey wrench into what scientist currently believe how the
universe was formed.
2. Cold Fusion
is a name for a
nuclear fusion
reaction that occurs below the temperature required for
thermonuclear
reactions. This technology is important for the benefits of creating
safe optional energy sources. In 1989 physicists announced they
successfully accomplished a cold fusion reaction. Some labs attempted
the same experimentation and concluded the same results. However most
other labs failed. The original accomplishment resulted in a
multimillion dollar governmental project, regardless of the fact that
the experiment did not require expensive equipment and could be
reproduced in a simple lab. The lurking question for Cold Fusion is. .
Where is the technology today? The fact is, there is no such thing as
cold fusion. The 1989 results were caused by experimental errors. I'm
not sure how so many scientists could make the same mistake. Perhaps
they wanted it so badly (the money) that they faked the results?
3. Still
accepted by politically correct Homosexual fanatics, (meaning, they are
pro-homosexual, not homosexual themselves) that homosexual behavior
cannot be helped, as it is a biological irregularity regurgitated from a
"gay gene". Homosexuality is still widely believed to be an inborn
genetic condition, and this is precisely what Dr. Simon LeVey made up.
It has been proven to be false, and the public has been deliberately
mislead, because this homosexual doctor wanted to justify his own sexual
confusion. Even though proven to be false, the lies are still taught
as fact.
4.
For many years eggs were forbidden food because of their high
cholesterol content. But today, new studies show we can eat one or two
eggs per day without measurable changes in blood cholesterol levels.
Which is it scientist, eggs or no eggs? I'm not taking any chances.
I'm dropping the Lipitor and consuming as much cholesterol as possible.
It's becoming overwhelmingly clear that if we throw darts at a
dartboard, we are more likely to get it right than the god-like
scientists who soak up billions of our tax dollars. Their argument to
not teach "Intelligent design" is thus: "Nothing in the Bible can be
proven wrong, which means that creationism cannot be tested. And if it
cannot be tested, it cannot by definition, be a theory, and is thus not
scientific. In other words, we teach science in science class.
Creationism cannot be scientifically tested, and for that reason, it
doesn't get taught in science class. Using their own logic, Science isn't
an exact science either, so let's not teach it at all.
Actually, I'm for putting all theories on the table. If
all of the information on one side of an issue is
represented in the classroom such as is the case for evolution, and all
of the information on the other side is repressed, this by definition is
indoctrination and cannot be considered instruction. Let it be
mandated that no issue be left out of the classroom, unless a parent
voluntarily withdraws his/her child's participation. Parents shouldn't
need to worry about being undermined when all theories are represented
and treated with equal footing. What happened to parental involvement
in the classroom anyway? Parents should be concerned with what subjects
their children are exposed to and what subjects they want to avoid, such
as: multiculturalism and sex education.
If any theory is proven false, it should be tossed out in the bad idea
dumpster. If these highly educated and scientifically superior minds
can disprove that God has plans for man in his design for the universe,
then let them speak up now. I don't want to continue believing a lie.
My faith is not in my belief, but in the one whom I believe, and if
anyone can demonstrate that there is no God, I'll be the first to say
I've been duped, and Christianity is a ruse.
As a former collegiate
football player, Brad graduated from Evangel College of Springfield,
Missouri, in 1982, with a Bachelors Degree in Business Administration
and Economics. His occupation has been divided between careers as a
stock broker, Director of Business Development for a commercial
insurance brokerage firm, and most recently financial management
within the healthcare industry. While using the podium of various
internet message boards, he discovered an appetite for engaging
Liberals in the "warfare of words". Stemming from his sometimes overly
zealous demeanor and passionate, "take-no-prisoner" approach, he has
been labeled by some as angry and others a rebel. At present, as a
contributing writer, his work can be read at
People Political
, The
Conservative Voice
,
MichNews,
Capitol Hill Coffee
House,
mensNEWSdaily,
and TheRant,
to list a few.
Brad's
Personal WebLink and
Email Address
The opinions expressed in
this column represent those of the author and do not necessarily reflect
the opinions, views, or philosophy of TheRealityCheck.org, Inc.
|
