|
Campaign
Finance Reform More About Campaigns Than Finances:
Additional Thoughts On The On-line Implications Of McCain/Feingold
by
Frederick Meekins
It has
been suggested that certain interpretations of the McCain/Feingold
Campaign Finance Reform could authorize the government to crackdown on
bloggers by equating this new form of expression with contributing to a
political campaign. This concern shows that this legislation is more
about suppressing the free speech of average Americans than about
curtailing the influence of big money on the political process.
Despite
causing the powerbrokers of the mainstream media to shake in their $500
suits for fear of losing their stranglehold over the flow of information
and thus the minds of the public, a personal blog is nothing whatsoever
like a campaign contribution. If anything, this new medium is more the
electronic equivalent of a sign posted on your front lawn or a bumper
sticker plastered across the rear of your car.
Maybe
Darth McCain would like to outlaw those forms of communication also while
we are at it. While we are at it, why don’t we also outlaw private
telephone conversations and individual e-mails of a political nature;
wouldn’t want personal relationships to take precedence over the edicts
handed down from on high by our glorious leaders.
Such a
proposal would not be too hard to implement. ECHELON already scours
electronic communications for threats of terrorism; simply expand the
search parameters to include subversive exchanges of a politically
persuasive nature as well.
Since the
nation can no longer afford to let politics distract from the
all-important work of the state and its never-ending expansion, maybe we
should just go ahead and abolish elections while we’re at it since we
cannot allow unqualified opinions to take precedence over the postulations
of credentialed experts.
This is,
after all, the destination to which Campaign Finance Reform is a mere
first step. In what is nothing less than a display of the Jedi mindtrick
that would put Darth Vader to shame, the senior Sith from Arizona has
duped the American people into thinking his version of the Enabling Act is
essential to the survival of the Old Republic. The measure will in fact
turn this nation into an empire.
The First
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads, “Congress shall make no
law...abridging the freedom of speech.” The McCain Finance Law stipulates
what kind of political speech can be enunciated and when it is
appropriate. Thus by definition this act abridges speech by placing
constraints of propriety upon it.
It does
not take an Ivy League graduate to see this law violates the
Constitution. It appears only those avoiding such dens of sophistry are
capable of grasping such a simple truth since those at the highest levels
of government indoctrinated in such elitist settings have done little to
oppose the statute.
Many in
Congress are so enamored by the law it has been nicknamed the “Incumbent
Protection Act” since it makes it more difficult for a grassroots uprising
to unseat unresponsive representatives. More interested in their own
stash of pornography and what the Eurotrash in the Hague thinks of them,
the Supreme Court fumbled the gavel by upholding the McCain/Feingold
legislation.
Of course,
big media has no problem with the law --- nor this interpretation of it
--- since the law stifles the primary competition of the outdated
dinosaurs of mass communication such as special interest talk radio,
direct mail, and now potentially ezines and blogs.
Then there
is President Bush; what can we say about him? Typical of the spineless
vacillation plaguing many Republicans today, the President initially said
he was opposed to the bill but eventually signed it into law anyway.
McCain
Campaign Finance Reform has nothing whatsoever with democratizing the
political process but rather is a sledgehammer designed to impose an
uniformity of thought so the elite to maintain its monopoly of opinion.
All curtailments to liberty are a cause for concern, but the logistics
necessary to enforce this scheme would be particularly unsettling.
For if
government beancounters are going to enforce prohibitions against partisan
speech so many days out from an election, doesn’t that mean the government
will have to know of the existence of the blogs beforehand. As in the
case of political action committees and the like, does this mean
opinionated websites will have to register with government, essentially
requiring a license to blog?
Eventually, such thought regulation will be extended to all forms of
communication and the exchange of ideas. Dave Kopel of the Independence
Institute hypothesizes that, combined with the McCain/Leiberman Anti-Gunshow
law that requires all vendors at firearm exhibitions to register with the
government regardless of whether or not they sell guns, Campaign Finance
Reform could make it against the law to sell or dispense unapproved
political literature at these gatherings, thus proving once and for all
that without a healthy respect of the Second Amendment the First Amendment
is soon to follow.
“Big
deal. We don’t care about gun nuts and computer geeks.” Maybe so, but
the funny thing is that revolutions have a tendency of consuming their own
and the very thing you intend to use to squash your opposition can be
turned around and used against you.
Certain
liberals, progressive, or whatever else the leftist rabble insists on
calling themselves this week look favorably upon Campaign Finance Reform
as a way to silence conservatives and “elevate the public dialogue” as
elitists like to say. However, their celebration should be tempered by
the realization that their is nothing keeping the law from being used to
censor their own pet causes.
Back
during the last election, Citizen’s United accused Michael Moore of
violating Campaign Finance Reform because this slovenly Hutt hoped this
propaganda would influence the outcome of the election. But do we really
want the courts to put an end to the speech we disagree with?
For if we
do, it won’t be long until we find ourselves on the other end of a lawsuit
trying to do the same thing to us.
Copyright 2005 by Frederick Meekins
The opinions expressed in
this column represent those of the author and do not necessarily reflect
the opinions, views, or philosophy of TheRealityCheck.org, Inc.
|