Friday, December 5, 2008

And We Thought Illegal Aliens Were Bad Enough


Posted by Bob Parks On December - 26 - 2007


Just because we can do something, doesn’t necessarily mean we should.We’ve got all these scientists monkeying around with genetic links and tossing ethical concerns out the window on an almost daily basis. While seeking cures for an assortment of diseases, pumping ourselves full of short-term antibiotic cures, are we setting ourselves up for some bio-catastrophe? Is that all we should be worrying about?

According to Troy Allen-Mills of The Australian, a new debate is heating up about the scientific community’s quest for seeking out intelligent life in outer space, and whether it’s really a good idea or not. I guess this could be a good place to place a partisan spin on things.A liberal mind would surmise that all beings out yonder are peace-loving creatures. Upon discovering our primitive civilization, they’d want to embrace us with compassion and understanding. On the other hand, my conservative mind says that while there’s a good chance they’d be friendly, there’s also a good chance they may see us as food, thus we may not wish to leave our doors unlocked.

“We’re talking about initiating communication with other civilizations, but we know nothing of their goals, capabilities or intent.”

– John Billingham, a former NASA scientist who has quit in protest from an extraterrestrial study group set up by the International Academy of Astronautics over a lack of public discussion about the possible consequences of attracting the attention of aliens by sending signals deep into space

Very few of us would leave a large sign on our front doorsteps, inviting strangers into our homes, yet we’ve been doing this for decades, and who knows who (or what) plans on responding to our invitations. Surely, you would talk to others in your household to see if they were comfortable inviting just anyone in. We, the collective population of the planet Earth, have not been given the courtesy of such discussion, while our self-anointed, intellectual superiors have taken it upon themselves to issue invitations for strangers to potentially enter all of our homes.

According to The Australian, “In California last October, astronomers switched on the first elements of a giant array of radio telescopes that will vastly extend the sweep of signals into outer space. Known as the Allen Telescope Array, it was built with the help of a $US25 million ($26million) donation from Paul Allen, the billionaire co-founder of Microsoft, and is a joint project of the Radio Astronomy Laboratory of the University of California at Berkeley, and the Seti (search for extraterrestrial intelligence) Institute, the US’s foremost centre of ET research.”We’ve essentially done the same thing (not to this extreme) in many nations around our globe. There are all kinds of low-tech magnets attracting many people into countries, and as we all know, not all who enter do so with the best of intentions. Some are people who have no intention of playing by the rules of the nations they’ve entered, and no one within is immune.

“Those astronomers now preparing again to beam radio signals out to hoped-for extraterrestrials are naive, even dangerous.”

– Jared Diamond, Pulitzer Prize winning professor of evolutionary biology

It doesn’t matter if you’re rich or poor, black or white, young or old. Everyone is a potential target of these intruders, most of whom were lured by our benevolence (and naiveté).

Some of the people issuing these extra-terrestrial invitations on our behalf, are seemingly so absorbed, they haven’t given a thought to the consequences.

“I like to call Seti the longest of long shots. But if this array picks up a signal, that would be an amazing thing – a civilization-changing event.”

– Paul Allen

Mr. Allen probably thinks he, and what he’s doing, is very cool. I hope it got him laid.

“What should exist?

“To me, that’s the most exciting question imaginable. What do we need that we don’t have? How can we realize our potential? What will it take to solve important problems and improve people’s lives? What should exist, and how might we create it—right now?

“I have always been captivated by new ideas that answer these questions. From technology to science to music to art, I’m inspired by those who’ve blurred the boundaries, who’ve looked at the possibilities, and said, “What if…?”

PaulAllen.com

But think about this, and forgive me if this sounds like a Hollywood pitch for “Independence Day II”….

Suppose there’s this race of inter-galactic scavengers, roaming around the universe, devouring everything in their path. It could well be that they may be running out of planetary bodies to ravage, but as luck would have it, they receive a signal from Mr. Allen’s radio telescope saying, “C’mon down!” This race derives from the “primitive”, PC-based signal received that we’re probably a pushover, at best. And once they get here, will Mr. Allen even think about issuing an apology, and if so, what’ll it be worth?

What happens if the respondents are not that intelligent, but respond by instinct (see “parasites”)? Who, or what, are we luring here and what kind of “civilization-changing event” might they bring about?

It always seems to come back to ethics questions.

Who will speak for Earth if an alien civilization replies? That may all depend on the intentions of the responders.

If they are “nice aliens”, there are lots of people they could talk to. Most governments have good people within. I wouldn’t suggest they go first to the United Nations. The Secretary General would probably be designated the spokesman, but we’d probably piss off the aliens soon thereafter when the UN started demanding kickbacks.

“It’s an assumption that they will be friendly – a dangerous assumption.

“It is unscientific to impute to remote intelligences wisdom and serenity, just as it is to impute to them irrational and murderous impulses. We must be prepared for either possibility.”

– Bernard Lovell, British founder of the Jodrell Bank Observatory

There are more than enough bad people here that it would be a disaster for aliens to contact first. Without naming names, these people are dangerous enough with limited earthly technology. Imagine having weaponry at their disposal we can’t even comprehend, along with allies who traveled light years to get here? Their “guns” would make our ICBMs look like paper clips shot by rubber bands.

“Any creatures out there might be malevolent or hungry.”

– Sir Martin Ryle, the Astronomer Royal, Great Britain

We have those who consider themselves smart enough to make these decisions for all of us. They believe all we have to do is talk to these people, and they’ll mean us no harm. Some of us don’t believe that we should be welcoming everybody. We don’t know enough about the intentions of those joining us. We should be ready to defend ourselves, but as we don’t know if we can or not, we may wish to rethink these invitations.

But the damage may have already been done.

“Should we ever hear the space-phone ringing, for God’s sake let us not answer. We must avoid attracting attention to ourselves.

– Zdenek Kopal, astronomer

Invitations (on our behalf) have already been sent out. When the doorbell rings, it may be too late at that point to start discussing whether or not we should open the door. Arrogant scientists have made that decision for us.

Let’s hope they were right.

Bob Parks is a member/writer for the National Advisory Council of Project 21, Senior Writer for the New Media Journal, VP of Marketing and Media Relations/Staff Writer for the New Media Alliance, VP of the Massachusetts Republican Assembly, and commentator for the Intel Radio Network

Add A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.